Indication intelligence

The €150k assessment, distilled to a briefing you can act on.

Corporate development and M&A teams in biotech and big pharma do not need another twelve-week landscape. They need the thesis on an indication — epidemiology, treatment, pipeline, price, KOLs, residual unmet need — in time for the next IC.

Typical consulting OA

€100–150k

8–12 weeks. An 80-page deck. Three slides get read.

What the IC actually uses

The thesis

Addressable patients. Residual unmet need. What the next asset is worth.

Aperture Brief

€12–48k

Days, not a quarter. A model you can stress, not a PDF you archive.

The problem

Opportunity assessments became a luxury good for a commodity question.

We spent years in life-science strategy consulting writing the same object: scope an asset inside an indication. Competitive landscape. Unmet need. Epidemiology. Pipeline. KOL and patient voice. Then a number.

Clients paid six figures because the alternative was an intern and a messy folder of Evaluate and Citeline exports. What they actually needed, most of the time, was a clean snapshot they could defend in a Tuesday meeting — kill, keep, or bid.

Aperture exists for that meeting. Custom per indication, because Duchenne is not heart failure and a mutation split is not a NYHA split. Interactive, because a static prevalence number is how models go wrong. Cheap enough that Search & Eval can run ten of them a year, not two.

What you get

One executive snapshot. Then a page for every question the IC will ask.

Epidemiology you can model

Incidence to treated, cut by mutation, stage, geography. Newborn screening and diagnosis rate as levers — not footnotes.

Treatment algorithm

Lines, share, price, endpoints, whether anything is actually curative, and the residual unmet need each product leaves on the table.

Pipeline, classified

Phase, modality, pathway, route. Late-stage assets with the endpoint and the last readout, not a logo slide.

Who treats, who speaks

KOLs, centres of excellence, clinic networks. The map that tells you where the patients actually sit.

Voice

What patient groups and clinicians are arguing about this quarter — access, safety scares, infusion burden, the heart.

Asset deep-dive

Probability of success, time to market, a peak-revenue build you can break. The page Corp Dev opens last and remembers.

Case studies

Three briefs. One of them is fully open.

All work

Solutions

Priced for a Search & Eval budget, not a transformation programme.

Snapshot

€12,000

per indication · 5 business days

The exec view Corp Dev actually reads. Enough to kill or keep a conversation.

  • Executive snapshot (thesis, so-what, residual unmet need)
  • Epidemiology funnel for one geography set (US / EU5 / JP)
  • Treatment algorithm with share, efficacy, safety
  • Pipeline cut by phase, modality, pathway, route
  • List pricing on marketed products
  • PPT + Excel extract
Request Snapshot

Brief

€28,000

per indication · 10 business days

The product we expect most Search & Eval teams to buy. A working model, not a PDF.

  • Everything in Snapshot
  • Interactive epidemiology (mutation, stage, geography)
  • KOL map + centers of excellence / clinic networks
  • Patient and clinician voice themes
  • One asset deep-dive (PoS, time-to-market, peak build)
  • Quarterly data refresh for 12 months
Request Brief

Mandate

€48,000

per indication · 15 business days

When the asset is live in a process and the IC needs a number, not a narrative.

  • Everything in Brief
  • Up to four asset deep-dives with scenario trees
  • Custom addressable-market build the team can edit
  • Competitor war-gaming and deal implications
  • Two working sessions with the Aperture partners
  • Priority refresh if a readout or label moves
Request Mandate

Aperture Desk retainer — €9,500/ month. A living library. New snapshots on request, existing briefs kept current.

Who we are

Ex-consultants who got tired of charging a fortune for a snapshot.

Aperture is being built by two life-science strategy consultants. We have written the long version of this product, many times, for corporate development, search & evaluation, and commercial strategy teams.

The method is the same. The cost structure is not. Agents do the first pass across labels, trials, registries and open voice. We review, argue with the model, and sign the thesis.

Days, not a quarter

Snapshot in a week. Brief in ten business days. Mandate when a process is live.

Custom, never a template

Duchenne is cut by mutation and ambulation. ATTR by genotype and NAC stage. The model follows the disease.

Human-signed

Agents collect. Partners decide what the IC is allowed to believe.